30212

SoSe 22: Civic Identity in Europe

Bujar Aruqaj

Kommentar

In this course we will initially review the theoretical approaches to civic identification which stands in contrast to ethnocentric and nationalist identification. The debate on civic identification can be traced back in the disciplines of sociology, political science and political philosophy alike. Thus, according to Parsons (1971, 307) the more differentiated the system, the higher “the level of generality at which the value-pattern must be couched” if it is to legitimate the more specified values of all of the differentiated parts of the social system. Rawls (1971; 1985), developed the idea of a “well ordered society” as a normative proposition considering the possibility of whether a society could exist stably under conditions of religious and philosophical diversity, where there is no body of deep foundational ideas affirmed by all citizens. Similarly, Jürgen Habermas popularized the concept of “constitutional patriotism” in the 1980s (Habermas 1994, 6). The concept is often applied in connection to the member countries of the European Union which might find value in alternative forms of political belonging.

The rise of support for right-wing political actors is often viewed as a threat and an indicator of a return to national identification. David Easton on the other hand defines “support for the political community” as the diffuse support for the political authorities or regime which typically express itself in the form of trust or confidence in them. However, for the political community the same kind of diffuse attitudes may appear as a sense of we-feeling, common consciousness or group identification (Easton 1953, 391; 1975). Thus, more practically civic identity is best understood as a set of beliefs and emotions about oneself as a participant in civic life (Knefelkamp 2008, 6). It refers to a broader sense of developing and situating oneself and one’s beliefs within a group of people, and how one engages with others in the social, political, and economic structures within their society.

In the first part of this course we will assess the values, norms, and practices conducive to civic identity and engagement as a comparative aspect of European societies. We will further review the literature on competing explanations of identity formation such as primordialism, instrumentalism, constructivism, and the literature on symbolic boundaries (Lamont and Molnár 2002). In the second part we will inspect more recent “nation building” projects in the post-socialist societies of Eastern and Southeastern Europe specifically. We will assess to what extent these societies were able to reconstruct, structure or “reimagine” their national identity (Andersen 1991). Further, we will take a critical look at so-called “nation branding” campaigns where societies are often articulated as post-ethnic, cosmopolitan, entrepreneurial national subjects, while disregarding real social divisions on the ground (Kaneva 2017; 2018). We will explore the challenges of fostering common civic identification in “deeply divided” societies (Guelke 2012). In the final part of the course, we will address the potential and problematic of digital and social media which have arguably fundamentally altered the civic landscape, and creating opportunities for civic engagement as well as distinct challenges (James and Lee 2017; Viola 2020). Schließen

12 Termine

Regelmäßige Termine der Lehrveranstaltung

Mo, 14:00 - 16:00 12 Termine

Mo, 25.04.2022 14:00 - 16:00

Dozenten:
Bujar Aruqaj